MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988519171 · doi:10.1142/s0219887822500906

Magnetic field effect on the dynamics of entanglement for time-dependent harmonic oscillator

2022· article· en· W2988519171 on OpenAlexaff
Radouan Hab‐arrih, Ahmed Jellal, Abdeldjalil Merdaci

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum entanglementHarmonic oscillatorPhysicsQuantum mechanicsDynamics (music)Quantum electrodynamicsField (mathematics)Classical mechanicsMathematicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the dynamics of entanglement, uncertainty and mixedness by solving time-dependent Schrödinger equation for two-dimensional harmonic oscillator with time-dependent frequency and coupling parameter subject to a static magnetic field. We compute the purities (global/marginal) and then calculate explicitly the linear entropy [Formula: see text] as well as logarithmic negativity [Formula: see text] using the symplectic parametrization of vacuum state. We introduce the spectral decomposition to diagonalize the marginal state and get the expression of von Neumann entropy [Formula: see text] and establish its link with [Formula: see text]. We use the Wigner formalism to derive the Heisenberg uncertainties and show their dependencies on both [Formula: see text] and the coupling parameters [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] of the quadrature term [Formula: see text]. We graphically study the dynamics of the three features (entanglement, uncertainty, mixedness) and present a similar topology with respect to time. We show the effects of the magnetic field and quenched values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on these three dynamics, which lead eventually to control and handle them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207