Decentralized PEV Power Allocation With Power Distribution and Transportation Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) keep on penetrating the automobile market. However, uncoordinated PEV charging can impair the reliability of power grid. In this paper, an interesting problem of PEV charging power allocation is investigated, in which both power distribution and transportation constraints are considered. A novel approach for PEV charging management based on optimal power flow (OPF) analysis is proposed to optimize PEV charging energy in a power distribution system. Firstly, spatial and temporal PEV demand scheduling is introduced to maximize PEV charging service capacity while considering the maximum traveling distance of PEVs. Secondly, to ensure the scalability of the OPF analysis, a distributed optimization technique, i.e., proximal Jacobian alternating direction multiplier method, is applied to attain the optimal power allocation in a decentralized manner. The resulting PEV charging service capacity in the power distribution system is improved without violating power distribution and transportation constraints. Furthermore, kernel density estimation method is adopted to identify the PEV range anxiety constraint without the PEV battery information. Simulation results are presented to validate the effectiveness of our approach with high PEV penetration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".