MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition in the Athabasca oil sands region is correlated with foliar nutrient levels and soil chemical properties

2019· article· en· W2988666380 on OpenAlexafffundabout
M. Derek MacKenzie, Sebastian Dietrich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersOffice of Surface Mining Reclamation and EnforcementWood Buffalo Environmental Association
KeywordsTopsoilNutrientDeposition (geology)NitrogenSoil acidificationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceOil sandsSulfurSoil pHChemistrySoil waterSoil scienceGeologySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oil extraction industry and human activity in north eastern Alberta has been growing steadily since the 1960’s and is a source of air pollution. In the late 1990’s the Wood Buffalo Environmental Association was established to monitor air quality for both public and environmental health. A primary environmental concern was soil acidification caused by sulfur (S) and nitrogen (N) deposition. A network of forest health monitoring (FHM) sites was established in dry jack pine ecosystems to serve as an early indicator of negative impacts. A sampling campaign was executed in 2011 and this study examines soil properties and foliar nutrients in the context of measured and modeled acid deposition. Total N (TN), SO42−, pH, base cation to aluminum ratio (BC:Al), and base saturation (% BS) are reported for the organic layer (LFH) and 3 depths in the mineral soil, while foliar nutrients were analysed from current annual growth in jack pine needles. Atmospheric deposition of S, N, BC, and potential acid input (PAI) in the study area was recently provided by Edgerton et al. (2020) and soil and foliar chemistry was evaluated based on deposition estimates and measurements. Inverse distance weighting was used to examine spatial patterns and regression analysis was used to quantify relationships between variables. The results indicated that S deposition is spatially correlated with foliar SO42− concentration, and LFH SO42−, but not mineral topsoil (0–5 cm) SO42−. Nitrogen deposition was spatially correlated with foliar N concentration, but not LFH or topsoil TN indicating potential uptake by the foliage or rapid uptake by roots in the LFH layer. High BC deposition in the same areas with the highest potential acid inputs (PAI) did not correlate significantly with changes in soil pH. However, LFH pH was significantly related to dry NH3 deposition, which has not been reported previously and requires further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→