Impact of pregnancy on sexuality : a cross-sectional study of 100 tunisian women.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a period during which anatomical, physiological and psychological changes may affect couple sexuality. AIM: To determine the knowledge and practices in sexuality, and identify the particularities of the sexual function during pregnancy. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study of pregnant women who responded to a questionnaire sent by Internet through a social network. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the 100 enrolled women were aged 25 to 34 years; 97% had a university education, and 66% were in the third quarter. Ninety-four percent of women thought that sexual intercourse is possible during pregnancy. The main reason to continue having sex during pregnancy was to have pleasure for either partner (87%). The reasons not to have sex were mainly fatigue (63%) and discomfort (51%). The main sources of information were the Internet (82%) and physicians (70%). During pregnancy, 92% of women continued to have sex with, however, a reduced frequency compared to the period before pregnancy. Fifty-five percent of women had a decreased desire level, and sexual satisfaction was also decreased in 43% of women. Sexual desire and lubrication were present half the time or more in the second quarter in, respectively, 69% and 55% of pregnant women. The difference with pregnant women in the first and third quarters was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study focused on women who had most often access to scientific information about pregnancy and sexuality. The pleasure was the main reason to continue having sexual activity. The second quarter was the most sexually "rich" period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".