MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988962338 · doi:10.3386/w26444

A Journal-Based Replication of “Being Chosen to Lead”

2019· report· en· W2988962338 on OpenAlexafffund
Allan Drazen, Anna Dreber Almenberg, Erkut Özbay, Erik Snowberg

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2019
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaAustrian Science FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsReplication (statistics)Lead (geology)Computer scienceInternet privacyBiologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent large-scale replications of social science experiments provide important information on the reliability of experimental research.Unfortunately, there exist no mechanisms to ensure replications are done.We propose such a mechanism: journal-based replication, in which the publishing journal contracts for a replication between acceptance and publication.We discuss what we learned from a proof-of-concept journal-based replication at the Journal of Public Economics.Our experience indicates that journal-based replication would be relatively straightforward to implement for laboratory experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.507
GPT teacher head0.611
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesFrench-language works237,207