MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989091986 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.tradrev.45935

O RECANTO DE UM JARDIM: HENRI SALVADOR EM PORTUGUÊS

2019· article· pt· W2989091986 on OpenAlexaff
BIA KRIEGER, Álvaro Faleiros

Bibliographic record

VenueTRADUÇÃO EM REVISTA · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O intuito deste trabalho é refletir sobre o modo como a canção Jardin d hiver, composta por Keren-Ann Zeidel, e Benjamin Biolay para ser interpretada, em 2000, por Henri Salvador em seu álbum Chambre avec vue, foi traduzida para o português por Bia Krieger para ser gravada pelo próprio Henri Salvador em 2002 (https://www.deezer.com/en/track/3483754). Para embasar a análise parte-se, primeiramente, de uma breve descrição do contexto de produção da canção para, em seguida, por meio de discussão a respeito das implicações envolvidas no ato de se traduzir uma canção, pensar o que está em jogo nessa recriação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTRADUÇÃO EM REVISTASame topicLiterature, Culture, and CriticismFrench-language works237,207