Reassessment of taxonomic characters for the plant bug genus Hypseloecus Reuter, with descriptions of new species of Hypseloecus and the related genus Lasiolabops Poppius (Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Old World plant bug genus Hypseloecus Reuter of the tribe Pilophorini is reviewed on the basis of detailed observation of the morphological characters, with an updated checklist of Asian congeners. “Pleural glands” are herein suggested as a novel diagnostic character and currently considered as an additional autapomorphy for the genus. Two Asian new species, Hypseloecus nakagawai sp. n. (from Honshu, Japan) and H. aaroni sp. n. (Bagmati Zone, Nepal), are diagnosed and described. The host association and habitat of H. nakagawai are also documented. An Old World pilophorine genus, Lasiolabops Poppius, assumed to be a potential sister taxon of Hypseloecus, is diagnosed and discussed; further, two new species, L. cirratus sp. n. (from Japanese Ryukyus) and L. remicornis sp. n. (from Central Thailand), are described, based on their distinctive vestiture pattern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".