The influence of heating on liquid jet spreading and hydraulic jump
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The free-surface flow and thermal fields formed by an axisymmetric liquid jet impinging on a circular heated disk are examined theoretically. The disk is maintained either at a prescribed heat flux or temperature. The study explores the effect of inertia, wall heat flux and wall temperature on the momentum and thermal boundary layers as well as the film thickness and the location and height of the hydraulic jump. Only non-metallic liquids are considered, for which the kinematic viscosity is generally larger than the thermal diffusivity, causing the thermal boundary layer to remain thinner than the momentum boundary layer. The effect of surface tension resulting in the Marangoni stress at the free surface and the hoop stress at the jump is also explored. Our results corroborate well existing experimental, theoretical and numerical studies. Both the momentum and thermal boundary layers are found to decrease with increased inertia or thermal input at the disk. The thermal boundary layer is found to always reach the free surface for an imposed constant wall heat flux. The two transition locations where the boundary layers reach the free surface move downstream with inertia but move in opposite directions with increasing wall heat flux or wall temperature. Enhanced heating from the wall also tends to increase the jump radius and depress its height. More importantly, the hydraulic jump leads to a shock-type drop in the Nusselt number, confirming existing numerical findings. Finally, we show that the Nusselt number is independent of the wall temperature for a fluid of constant properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".