Occupational Therapy Handwriting Interventions on a Systems-Level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Julie Anderson, DrOT, OTR/L, is an occupational therapist in the Puyallup School District who works with elementary aged students. For this project, Dr. Anderson worked as the primary collaborator with occupational therapy students to answer the question: What is the evidence that occupational therapy interventions at a systems-level improve student's academic performance and skill development outcomes, such as handwriting, in elementary age students with and without disabilities? The results of this descriptive study indicate strong evidence that systems-level interventions, involving an occupational therapist, in a school setting improve at least one area of a student’s skill development. Additionally, any consistent handwriting curriculum improved handwriting skills in elementary school children compared to no handwriting curriculum. Finally, when teachers and occupational therapists collaborate, systems-level interventions can be implemented to best fit the needs of individual classrooms. Future research in this area should work to define the terms “systems-level” and “collaboration.” This would allow consistent results when comparing various studies performed at a systems-level and involving collaboration, as currently studies use multiple terms to describe the same approaches.\nKnowledge translation for this project included compiling the systematic review, as well as other handwriting research, into a PowerPoint to be presented to administrators at the Puyallup School District. The aim of this presentation was to educate administrators on the benefits of a districtwide handwriting curriculum for kindergarten and first grade classrooms, provide details on specific curricula and provide a possible implementation plan. Pre- and post-survey results, gathered at the presentation, indicate that administrators within the Puyallup School District believe they should have a districtwide handwriting curriculum. All administrators picked TV Teacher as the top choice at the end of the presentation. As a result of the presentation, the administrator for the kindergarten academy in the Puyallup School District will be using TV Teacher as the kindergarten academy’s curriculum. Future recommendations regarding this knowledge translation include recording data on handwriting for either pre- and post-handwriting curriculum or utilizing a between group design that compares half the Puyallup School District using a handwriting curriculum to half not using a handwriting curriculum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".