Effect of superabsorbing polymers on potato yield
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Climate change is leading to an increase in drought, which is the largest abiotic stress factor leading to a decrease in crop yields. One of the methods in solving this problem is the use of superabsorbing polymers (SAPs) (China, USA, Canada, India, Italy, Iran, Poland, Turkey, and others). The aim of the research is to study the effect of using the superabsorbing polymers (cross-linked copolymer of potassium and ammonium salts of acrylic acid in the form of loose white granules) on the background of fractional-local application of mineral fertilizer to the crop formation. Field experience, accounting and observations were carried out in accordance with general requirements were used in our research. The studies were carried out in 2015-2017 on sod-podzolic sandy soil in the Lyubertsy district (Moscow region, Russia). When using superabsorbing polymers in an average of three years, the yield increased by 1.6…3.4 t/ha (5.5…Of 10.0%) for the studied cultivars; especially helpful was an early sort Meteor and a medium early variety Irbitskiy . It is possible to recommend the use of superabsorbing polymers at a dose of 200 kg/ha when growing potatoes in conditions of moisture deficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it