MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989847461 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.184424

Tensile deformations of the magnetic chiral soliton lattice probed by Lorentz transmission electron microscopy

2020· article· en· W2989847461 on OpenAlexaff
Gary W. Paterson, A. A. Tereshchenko, Shunichi Nakayama, Yusuke Kousaka, Jun‐ichiro Kishine, S. McVitie, А. С. Овчинников, Igor Proskurin, Yoshihiko Togawa

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilFoundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and MathematicsMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsSpintronicsMagnetic fieldMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyLattice (music)AnisotropyLorentz forcePerpendicularScrew axisPhase diagramLorentz transformationPhysicsPhase (matter)NanotechnologyClassical mechanicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsFerromagnetismGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the case of a chiral soliton lattice subjected to uniaxial elastic strain applied perpendicular to the chiral axis and derive through analytical modeling the phase diagram of magnetic states supported in the presence of an external magnetic field. The strain induced anisotropies give rise to three distinct nontrivial spin textures, depending on the nature of the strain, and we show how these states may be identified by their signatures in Lorentz transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Experimental TEM measurements of the Fresnel contrast in a strained sample of the prototypical monoaxial chiral helimagnet ${\mathrm{CrNb}}_{3}{\mathrm{S}}_{6}$ are reported and compare well with the modeled contrast. Our results demonstrate an additional degree of freedom that may be used to tailor the magnetic properties of helimagnets for fundamental research and applications in the areas of spintronics and the emerging field of strain manipulated spintronics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207