MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989849941 · doi:10.3390/ijgi8120525

Automated Method for Detection of Missing Road Point Regions in Mobile Laser Scanning Data

2019· article· en· W2989849941 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Ma, Yubing Zheng, Said M. Easa, Mingyu Hou, Jianchuan Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPixelComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMATLABLaser scanningPoint (geometry)Geodetic datumPoint cloudImage (mathematics)Path (computing)Plane (geometry)Missing dataImage planeLaserMathematicsOpticsGeographyGeodesyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper proposes a method supported by MATLAB for detection and measurement of missing point regions (MPR) which may cause severe road information loss in mobile laser scanning (MLS) point clouds. First, the scan-angle thresholds are used to segment the road area for MPR detection. Second, the segmented part is mapped onto a binary image with a pixel size of ε through rasterization. Then, MPR featuring connected 1-pixels are identified and measured via image processing techniques. Finally, the parameters regarding MPR in the image space are reparametrized in relation to the vehicle path recorded in MLS data for a better understanding of MPR properties on the geodetic plane. Tests on two MLS datasets show that the output of the proposed approach can effectively detect and assess MPR in the dataset. The ε parameter exerts a substantial influence on the performance of the method, and it is recommended that its value should be optimized for accurate MPR detections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207