Preservation of Neurovascular Coupling to Cognitive Activity in Anterior Cerebrovasculature During Incremental Ascent to High Altitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: High altitude sojourn challenges blood flow regulation in the brain, which may contribute to cognitive dysfunction. Neurovascular coupling (NVC) describes the ability to increase blood flow to working regions of the brain. Effects of high altitude on NVC in frontal regions undergoing cognitive activation are unclear but may be relevant to executive function in high-altitude hypoxia. This study sought to examine the effect of incremental ascent to very high altitude on NVC by measuring anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) hemodynamic responses to sustained cognitive activity. Materials and Methods: Eight adults (23 ± 7 years, four female) underwent bilateral measurement of ACA and MCA mean velocity and pulsatility index (PI) through transcranial Doppler during a 3-minute Stroop task at 1400, 3440, and 4240 m. Results: Resting MCA and ACA PI decreased with high-altitude hypoxia ( p < 0.05). Cognitive activity at all altitudes resulted in similar increases in MCA and ACA mean velocity, and decreases in ACA and MCA PI ( p < 0.05 for MCA, p = 0.07 for ACA). No significant altitude-by-Stroop interactions were detected, indicating NVC was stable with increasing altitude. Conclusions: Ascent to very high altitude (4240 m) using an incremental profile that supports partial acclimatization does not appear to disturb (1) increases in cerebral blood velocity and (2) reductions in pulsatility that characterize optimal NVC in frontal regions of the brain during cognitive activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".