MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989988678 · doi:10.1111/fcsr.12341

Parental Financial Socialization: Is Too Much Help Leading to Debt Ignorance among College Students?

2019· article· en· W2989988678 on OpenAlexaff
Jodi Letkiewicz, HanNa Lim, Stuart J. Heckman, Catherine P. Montalto

Bibliographic record

VenueFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIgnoranceDebtCredit cardSocializationPaymentPsychologyFinanceBusinessSocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence suggests that college students are unaware of their debt obligations. This study utilized the National Student Financial Wellness Study to examine whether aspects of financial parenting contribute to debt ignorance among college students. Reliance on parents for advice, parental financial support, and credit card payment responsibility were positively associated with ignorance of debt. Financial knowledge and working while in college reduced the likelihood of debt ignorance. We discuss implications for how parents can help their children become financially responsible young adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamily and Consumer Sciences Research JournalSame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207