Plan organization in XX. Century housing architecture in North Cyprus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of housing in Cyprus was shaped with the effects of life cultures of different civilizations throughout the history of Cyprus, and plan organization underwent changes by those effects. Housing plans, shaped with the effects of various cultures in the XX. Century in North Cyprus, shows variances. The plan typology of the first quarter of the century still carried the effects of the XIX. Century Ottoman Period, and Inner Hall Plan scheme, bearing characteristics of Traditional Turkish Houses, was widely used. During the second quarter of the century, between 1925 and 1950, the Inner Hall Plan scheme of the previous period underwent changes. Besides rooms opening to the hall, a plan scheme appeared in which rooms were connected to the hall with corridors. 1950-1975 became a period in Cyprus, in which houses were designed by architects. During this period, the use of reinforced concrete carcass enabled more organic solutions in plan organizations. Thus, instead of traditional plan schemes, personal house plans were designed to suit the needs of users. The last quarter of the century was a period of economic hardships in North Cyprus. Therefore, economic housing construction became the norm, with standard plan schemes, rather than personal designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".