PERTANGUNGG JAWABAN NOTARIS PPAT DALAM MELAKUKAN PELAYANAN PEMBAYARAN PAJAK BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN (BPHTB)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notary Services as a part of the service to the community, should walk parallel to the development of society in the present and future. One of notary services conducted in his position as PPAT is Payment service for land and building Rights (BPHTB) in terms of buying and selling of land rights. BPHTB payment is one of the conditions for the registration of land rights transitional in the provisions of Article 103 of the regulation of the Minister of Agrarian state/head of National Land Agency number 3 year 1997. Due to the existence of the BPHTB payment obligation resulted in the time period between the purchase and sale agreement carried out in front of the notary, with the implementation of the sale/turnover of land rights carried out in front of the authorized PPAT has a distance For a relatively long period of time, and usually buyers who conduct buy and sell rights to the land have handed over a certain amount of money for the cost of BPHTB by giving it to the notary public that makes the transitional deed. On the one hand, due to the relatively long period between the trade and Sale Alliance carried out before the notary with the sale and purchase carried out in the presence of the authorized PPAT, while the cost of BPHTB is deposited by the client to the notary public as the official The makers of Land deed (PPAT), allowing the opportunity of misappropriation by means of unpaying or embezzlement of BPHTB funds deposited
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".