MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990083124 · doi:10.2118/189812-pa

A New Simple Analytic Equation for Estimating Asymmetric Growth of Stimulated Reservoir Volume in Anisotropic Shales

2018· article· en· W2990083124 on OpenAlexaffabout
Qi Li, Roberto Aguilera

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Operations · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroseismAnisotropyEllipsoidHydraulic fracturingOil shaleGeologyPetroleum reservoirVolume (thermodynamics)Point sourceMechanicsPetroleum engineeringPhysicsSeismologyOpticsThermodynamicsGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The objective of this paper is to present the development and application of a simple equation for calculating the asymmetric growth of the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) in an anisotropic shale–petroleum reservoir using microseismic data, and the hydraulic diffusivities of the anisotropic shale. Calculation of the SRV is a problem tackled with solutions that involve different degrees of complexity. Because shale reservoirs are anisotropic, microseismic events generally develop 3D nonuniform asymmetric patterns around the injection points. This paper presents a new method with an easy–to–use analytic equation that allows for reproducing the asymmetric growth of microseismic events as a function of time by considering reservoir anisotropy. Asymmetric growth refers to the fact that propagation of the microseismic cloud in a given direction can be larger, equal, or smaller compared with the propagation in other directions. Accurate determination of the SRV asymmetric pattern is critical for use in specialized material–balance and reservoir–simulation models of shale–petroleum reservoirs. This determination allows for more–realistic projections of reservoir performance. The novelty of the method is the development of an easy–to–use approach for estimating SRV in a spatially nonuniform asymmetric anisotropic reservoir using octants in a coordinate system. The SRV is calculated from the volume of a symmetric ellipsoid divided by a constant value Vc. This is despite the fact that the point of injection of the fracturing fluids in the asymmetric reservoir can be at, close to, or far from the center of the ellipsoid. The development of Vc is presented in this paper. Use of the SRV calculation model is illustrated with real microseismic data of the Horn River Shale in Canada for a case where Vc is equal to 1.3722. Also presented are calculations of hydraulic diffusivities in this anisotropic shale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Production & OperationsSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207