MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990229525 · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.00465

A COHORT STUDY OF TRAFFIC-RELATED AIR POLLUTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY AMONG ADULTS IN THREE CANADIAN CITIES

2011· article· en· W2990229525 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hong Chen, Mark S. Goldberg, Richard T. Burnett, Michael Jerrett, Amanda J. Wheeler, Paul J. Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyCohortEnvironmental healthProportional hazards modelCohort studyPopulationAir pollutionMortality rateGerontologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Several longitudinal studies have demonstrated associations between air pollution and cardiovascular mortality, but few studies have assessed intra-urban variation in traffic-related pollution or evaluated health effects at lower levels of pollution that are typically seen in Canadian cities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an association exists between traffic-related air pollution and cause-specific cardiovascular mortality among adults living in Ontario, Canada. Methods: This population-based cohort study used as a sampling frame the Federal income tax database which captures 95% of Canadians. More than 660,000 adults who were 35 years of age and older and lived in 10 cities in Ontario between 1982 and 1986 were randomly selected from income tax database and were followed up through 2004. Mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease were ascertained for all subjects over the period of 1982-2004 using the Canadian Mortality Database. We report herein an analysis of a sub-cohort who, at the time of entry, lived in either Toronto, Hamilton, and Windsor, Ontario (n=205,430), for whom we were able to make use of concentrations of NO2 estimated from land use regression models. Adjusted Cox models included known individual risk factors and ecological covariables, and we conducted sensitivity analyses using indirect methods to adjust for smoking. Results: For each increase of 5ppb of NO2, the adjusted rate ratios (RR5ppb) were 1.08 (95%CI: 1.04-1.11) for all cardiovascular mortality and 1.09 (95%CI: 1.04-1.14) for ischemic heart disease. Further indirect adjustment for smoking reduced the effect estimates, but the positive associations remained: all cardiovascular mortality, 1.04 (95%CI: 1.00-1.09) and ischemic heart disease, 1.05 (95%CI: 1.00-1.11). We did not find any effect for cerebrovascular disease (RR5ppb=0.96; 95%CI: 0.89-1.03). Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and in particular, from ischemic heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207