Família e gestão democrática no contexto de uma educação especial inclusiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A escola tem sido alvo de diferentes investigacoes, dentre elas, a participacao da familia na comunidade escolar. No entanto, esta participacao ainda e vista como estranha, apesar de prevista na legislacao. O artigo integra o projeto “Avaliacao da qualidade da educacao ofertada aos alunos Publico Alvo da Educacao Especial em escolas publicas da Comarca de Bauru” no Estado de Sao Paulo e objetivou analisar se a gestao escolar e democratica e inclusiva. A pesquisa foi realizada em cinco escolas publicas, com 683 pais participantes. Os dados foram coletados por meio de questionario, sendo analisadas quantitativamente 18 questoes sobre gestao, inclusao e bullying . Os resultados apontam que os pais tem uma visao positiva da escola, mas nao se sentem parte da comunidade escolar. Os pais concordam que os alunos com deficiencia sao aceitos e que, em relacao ao bullying, ha suporte escolar. Conclui-se que, apesar da visao positiva dos pais, as escolas ainda nao conseguiram implementar uma gestao democratica e participativa com o envolvimento das familias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".