MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990372367 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2954043

Achieving Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Multi-Keyword Conjunctive Query Over Cloud

2019· article· en· W2990372367 on OpenAlexafffund
Fan Yin, Yandong Zheng, Rongxing Lu, Xiaohu Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEncryptionQuery optimizationWeb search queryHomomorphic encryptionQuery expansionSargableWeb query classificationRange query (database)Keyword searchScheme (mathematics)Data miningInformation retrievalDatabaseComputer securitySearch engine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the explosive growth of data, it has become increasingly popular to deploy the powerful cloud to manage data. Meanwhile, as the cloud is not always fully trusted, personal and sensitive data have to be encrypted before being outsourced to the cloud. Naturally, this brings a serious challenge for the cloud to provide secure and efficient query services over huge volumes of data. Although existing works have proposed some solutions to solve the above challenge, most of them just focus on the single keyword query and cannot directly support multi-keyword query. Even though some works have discussed solutions for the multi-keyword query, they cannot well balance the efficiency and privacy. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel multi-keyword conjunctive query scheme over cloud, which can achieve high query efficiency with small privacy leakage. In specific, we first design a tree-based index to support the multi-keyword conjunctive query and employ Boneh-Goh-Nissim (BGN) homomorphic encryption technique to protect its privacy. Then, based on the tree-based index, we propose a wildcard search algorithm to improve its query efficiency. Finally, the detailed security analysis shows that the proposed scheme is really privacy-preserving, and extensive simulation results also demonstrate its efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207