Histological evidence of reproductive senescence in Atlantic herring (<i>Clupea harengus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Senescence is the age-specific decline in fitness of adult organisms principally associated with a decline in survival rate (actuarial senescence) and fecundity (reproductive senescence). Although common in natural populations of many taxa, there are few examples in fishes. A recent study found age-specific increases in the relative frequency of macroscopically non-reproductive Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus Linnaeus, 1758), consistent with reproductive senescence in a number of Canadian populations. However, a non-adaptive explanation for these patterns, unrelated to senescence, could not be definitively ruled out. Here, we present the results of histological examination of herring gonads undertaken to examine this and another hypothesis. The sample size of macroscopically senescent gonads was small (n = 4 females), a function of the low abundance of large, older, purportedly senescent, herring in these populations subjected to high mortality rates, and constraints on obtaining fresh samples. The results indicate that these fish were senescent and not merely skip spawning, providing further evidence of senescence and the occurrence of a post-reproductive period in herring in Atlantic Canada. Based on existing theory for the evolution of senescence, observations of actuarial senescence in Norwegian spring-spawning herring suggest that this population may also experience reproductive senescence and that the phenomenon may occur broadly in the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".