Phase-Locked PIV Measurements of Vortex Shedding Characteristics Downstream of Straight Circular Finned Cylinders During Acoustic Resonance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Excitation of acoustic resonance by flow perturbation downstream of cylinders can result in hazardous levels of acoustic pressure. Previous studies have shown that straight finned cylinders are susceptible to flow-excited acoustic resonance. In this work, the excitation of acoustic resonance by flow around finned cylinders of different fin parameters including the spacing between the fins, the thickness of the fin, and the height of the fin is investigated. All the investigated finned cylinders have the same equivalent diameter. Phase-locked particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are carried out during acoustic resonance to characterize the flow field downstream of the cylinders and identify the influence of the fins on the flow structures at the peak of resonance excitation. Results show that straight circular fins excite acoustic resonance at lower velocities and result in higher sound pressure level compared with a single bare cylinder of the same effective diameter. This behaviour is due to the effect of fin parameters on the strength and the formation length of vortices shed during the acoustic cycle. A brief summary of the results is presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".