Shifts in the community composition of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) in a subtropical river over three decades
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Trichoptera is an ecologically and taxonomically diverse order, and caddisfly species are under increasing pressure from anthropogenic threats to larval habitats, rivers, and streams. 2. This study evaluated long‐term changes in caddisfly communities of the Ogeechee River, a subtropical blackwater river in the south‐eastern U.S. Coastal Plain, to understand how changes manifest as a result of ongoing human impacts. Two datasets separated by more than 30 years were used, each representing a 2‐year monthly quantitative sampling effort (1981–1983; 2015–2017). 3. Community structure of the Ogeechee River caddisflies significantly changed, though not in ways that were predicted. The average sensitivity values of the caddisfly community declined, contrary to the expectation that increasing human impacts on a river ecosystem would promote the survival of more pollution‐tolerant taxa. 4. Generic richness increased in the 2010s from the 1980s, perhaps as a result of relaxed competition following declines of large, dominant taxa. The increases in various taxa have resulted in similar overall abundance metrics between time periods, although other studies of Ogeechee River invertebrates indicate that the biomass of the new taxa is far lower than that produced by the assemblages of the 1980s. Functional richness, evenness, and dispersion were higher in the 2010s, but divergence was not. 5. This suggests that more nuanced monitoring efforts, focused on the threats to ecological function and the role of caddisflies (and other sensitive freshwater organisms), will be required to evaluate the changes in community structure and determine which taxa are most adversely affected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".