Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au printemps 1930, le jeune Beckett s’engage avec son ami Alfred Péron dans la traduction en français des premières pages d’Anna Livia Plurabelle, cette partie du Work in Progress de James Joyce qui deviendra en 1939 le chapitre huitième de Finnegans Wake. La traduction de Beckett et Péron devait paraître en décembre 1930 dans les pages de la revue Bifur dirigée par Georges Ribemont-Dessaignes, mais au dernier moment Joyce change d’avis et se résout à former une équipe composée par P. Soupault, I. Goll, E. Jolas, P. Léon et A. Monnier, avec qui il travaille à une nouvelle version publiée en 1931 dans la Nouvelle Revue Française. Cet article retrace le parcours de ce texte et de la traduction en français de ces pages, peut-être les plus célèbres de Finnegans Wake, tout en offrant une lecture entrecroisée de l’original et de ses deux premières versions françaises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".