MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990559247 · doi:10.1090/tran/8048

Internality of logarithmic-differential pullbacks

2019· article· lv· W2990559247 on OpenAlexaff
Ruizhang Jin, Rahim Moosa

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLogarithmDifferential (mechanical device)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysisThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A criterion in the spirit of Rosenlicht is given, on the rational function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f(x)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, for when the planar vector field <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="StartBinomialOrMatrix y prime equals x y Choose x prime equals f left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis EndBinomialOrMatrix"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="1"> <mml:mtable rowspacing=".2em" columnspacing="0.333em" displaystyle="false"> <mml:mtr> <mml:mtd> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> </mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> <mml:mtr> <mml:mtd> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> </mml:mtable> </mml:mstyle> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\left \{\begin {smallmatrix} y’=xy\\ x’=f(x) \end {smallmatrix}\right \}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> admits a pair of algebraically independent first integrals over some extension of the base field. This proceeds from model-theoretic considerations by working in the theory of differentially closed fields of characteristic zero and asking: If <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper D subset-of-or-equal-to double-struck upper A Superscript 1"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">D\subseteq \mathbb A^1</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a strongly minimal set internal to the constants, when is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="log Subscript delta Superscript negative 1 Baseline left-parenthesis upper D right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\operatorname {log}_{\delta }^{-1}(D)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, the pullback of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper D"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">D</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> under the logarithmic derivative, itself internal to the constants?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207