MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990590576

Toddler and preschooler sport participation: Take-up, pathways, and patterns of engagement

2019· article· en· W2990590576 on OpenAlexaffabout
Meghan Harlow, Jessica Fraser‐Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToddlerPsychologyDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While prominent life-span sport participation and development models suggest children enter organized sport at approximately six years of age (i.e., Developmental Model of Sport Participation [DMSP], CA´tA© & Fraser-Thomas, 2016; Long-Term Athlete Development Model [LTAD], CS4L, 2016), current trends indicate active free play is being replaced by organized sport at markedly younger ages (AAP, 2019; ParticipACTION, 2018). As limited research captures children's sport experiences during the early years (i.e., ages 0-6), this study aimed to advance understanding of toddler and preschooler sport participation, by exploring patterns of sport take-up, pathways, and general patterns of engagement. Data were collected through external program observations of five early-years sport programs (i.e., multi-sport, soccer, hockey, rugby, and gymnastics), as well as 10 semi-structured parent interviews (Mage = 36.4; six female, four male), who each had a child between 3-5 years of age enrolled in one of the aforementioned programs. Results offer novel insight into toddler and preschooler children's sport, organized physical activity, active-play, and unstructured sport habits, while also highlighting common features and engagement patterns within early-years sport programs (e.g., structure, movement/sport skill focus, play-based activities). Findings suggest existing models (i.e., DMSP, CA´tA© & Fraser-Thomas, 2016; LTAD, CS4L, 2016) do not reflect or align with the delivery of or experiences within early-years sport programming. Future research is needed to determine what engagement patterns/program activities are optimal for toddler and preschooler development, to in turn contribute to refined versions of models, while acknowledging that sport participation is occurring prior to six years of age.Acknowledgments: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [grant no. 435-2016-1630], and Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207