MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phenology analysis of moist decedous forest using time series Landsat-8 remote sensing data

2019· article· en· W2990605653 on OpenAlexaff
Siddhartha Khare, Sergio Rossi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenologyNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexDeciduousRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceVegetation (pathology)Elevation (ballistics)Enhanced vegetation indexTime seriesEcosystemPhysical geographyClimate changeGeographyVegetation IndexEcologyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and up–to-date monitoring of forests at mountainous regions at regular time interval is a challenging task. Remote sensing derived metrics such as vegetation indices are the most widely used tools for the estimation of forests phenological attributes and ecosystem monitoring. Thus, in this study, assessment of spectral traits has been carried out using satellite RS sensors derived information. In this study, the assessment was carried out from 2013 to the mid-2015 using Landsat-8 to understand NDVI phenology and modeling of phenology trends using temporal normalized phenology index (TNPI) and remote sensing derived variables such as land surface temperature (LST), elevation, aspect and slope within moist deciduous forest (MDF) of Doon valley of Western Himalayan of India. Results indicated that variations in topography and LST showed strong associations (p<0.001) with Landsat-8 derived TNPI. We observed that NDVI changed in lower elevation areas due to maximum change in LST. In conclusion, cross-validated statistics confirmed that TNPI was tested successfully for another MDF test site using Landsat-8 derived NDVI for two time steps of maximum and minimum vegetation growth period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→