The Adult Sprague-Dawley Sugen-Hypoxia Rat Is Still “the One:” A Model of Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension: Reply to Le Cras and Abman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the editor: Kojonazarov et al. recently reported severe emphysema in the SU5416/Hypoxia (SuHx) rat model of pulmonary hypertension (1). The authors found that adult male Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats had increased air-to-tissue ratio as judged by non-gated in vivo micro-computed tomography (CT), and an increased mean linear intercept (MLI) as surrogate of emphysema (1, 2). Le Cras and Abman now responded to the Kojonazarov report by underlining the “important role of the developmental timing of disrupted VEGF signaling” (3). They cite earlier studies conducted on the ovine fetus showing that VEGF inhibition caused vascular remodeling, reduction in vascular/airway growth, and neonatal pulmonary hypertension at birth (4). Although SU5416 is known to induce emphysema in rats housed in room air at Denver altitude (1609m altitude) (5, 6), we contended in our response letter (11) that, at least in male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, the combination of VEGFR inhibition and hypoxia does not lead to any biologically relevant emphysema or other significant parenchymal lung disease (7) but to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) due to severe angioproliferative remodeling (7, 8).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".