MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Recombinant Protein Infusion and Hydrodynamic Plasmid Delivery Strategies Provide Distinct and Complementary Approaches to the Characterization of Variant Forms of Von Willeband Factor (VWF) in VWF Knockout Mice.

2008· article· en· W2990636216 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia M. Pruss, Carol Hegadorn, Andrea Labelle, Erin Burnett, Mia Golder, David Lillicrap

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand factorADAMTS13Von Willebrand diseasePlateletKnockout mouseChemistryHemostasisCleavage (geology)Recombinant DNAPhenotypeWild typeMolecular biologyBleeding timeIn vivoMetalloproteinaseImmunologyMutantBiologyGeneMatrix metalloproteinaseInternal medicineGeneticsBiochemistryMedicinePlatelet aggregation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) is a large multimeric glycoprotein that mediates platelet adhesion to the damaged blood vessel wall and subsequent platelet aggregation at the site of vascular injury. The size of VWF multimers is regulated by the metalloprotease, ADAMTS13. Alterations in VWF sequence can lead to an increase or decrease in ADAMTS13-mediated cleavage, resulting in either a loss or increase in high molecular weight VWF multimers, respectively. With the availability of a VWF knockout mouse, variant forms of VWF can be evaluated in vivo in terms of their contribution to hemostasis and thrombosis. In these studies, we have taken into account the significant differences in VWF-GPIb binding and ADAMTS13 cleavage efficiency seen between mice and humans and have also assumed that functionally important residues are likely to be conserved between species. With these considerations in mind, the protocols described in this report utilize mouse-exclusive reagents. Previous reports of correction of the VWF KO phenotype using hydrodynamic gene delivery have shown contradictory results for correction of the bleeding time and blood volume loss as well as a grossly abnormal multimer structure of the rescued VWF protein, due initially to an inadvertent C799R mutation and latterly to factors possibly related to the site of VWF synthesis. In this study, we compare wild type VWF clearance to a cleavage site knockout, Y1605A/M1606A, a type 2A Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) mutation, R1597W, and the common type 1 VWD mutation, Y1584C. The murine R1597W variant exhibited increased ADAMTS13-mediated cleavage (0.36- fold ADAMTS13 concentration), and the Y1605A/M1606A variant greatly decreased cleavage in vitro (>100-fold ADAMTS13 concentration). VWF KO mice, 7-10 weeks old, were injected with recombinant murine VWF (200U/kg) produced in HEK293 cells. VWF antigen levels (VWF:Ag), multimers, and complete blood counts (CBCs) were performed. Compared to the wild type infused protein (T1/2=33.2 minutes), the Y1605A/M1606A and R1597W mutant proteins show faster clearance (T1/2=17.7 minutes, p<0.001, and 27.5 minutes, p=0.025, respectively). Although, surprisingly, the Y1605A/M1606A variant showed a preferential loss of high molecular weight material compared to wild type recombinant protein, the R1597W type 2A mutant had a much more rapid loss of the high molecular multimers compared to the other proteins analyzed. No statistical differences were observed for platelet counts or other CBC parameters post protein infusion regardless of mutation compared to resting VWF KO mice. Hydrodynamic injections of a plasmid containing the ubiquitous synthetic CAG promoter and wild type VWF were performed on eight week old mice, with delivery of 100μg plasmid DNA in 10% body weight Ringer’s solution over 5-7 seconds. Maximum VWF:Ag levels of 10.67 U/ml were observed two days post infusion, with a significant proportion of observable high molecular weight VWF, indistinguishable from normal C57BL6 mouse plasma pool. Mouse FVIII:C levels follow a similar trend over the time course with maximum levels observed on day 3 at 206.7% activity. Mouse platelet counts were affected, with lower platelet counts rebounding to normal levels by day 7. No other changes in CBCs were observed. Intriguingly, none of the recombinant forms of VWF nor the hydrodynamically produced VWF protein show the typical triplet structure observed in normal mouse and human plasma, regardless of circulation time. The recombinant proteins migrate with the central band of the multimer triplet, while that of the hydrodynamic protein migrates with the lower triplet band, showing a lower molecular weight. These differences could be due to changes in protein structure or glycosylation from normally produced platelet and endothelial VWF. CAG-mVWF DNA Hydrodynamic Injection Results Days post infusion VWF:Ag (U/ml) FVIII:C (%) Platelets (103/μl) All data presented as value ± SD from 2-3 mice. Resting values are from at least 20 VWF KO mice. 1 4.82±0.18 62±16.7 440±101 2 10.67±1.06 128.5±53.6 547±30 3 9.92±0.53 206.7±29.4 558±39 7 1.03±0.47 78.3±3.3 699±53 10 0.51±0.53 30.4±16 502±189 14 0.13±0.08 26.8±0 470±276 Resting 0.0±0.0 (-) 569±167

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→