Traducción dialógica decolonial. Experiencia con el pueblo maya-chuj
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Todo lo que conocemos acerca de los pueblos originarios ha pasado por la traducción. El desencuentro entre estos pueblos y las sociedades dominantes está acompañado de la carencia de traducciones que honren la diferencia. Nuestra propuesta es una forma de traducción dialógica y decolonizante que favorezca la comprensión entre mundos de vida y conocimientos culturales disímiles. Así, quienes no entienden ni la vida ni el mundo de la misma manera podrán conocerse, apreciarse y enriquecerse mutuamente. Basados en la experiencia de traducción dialógica de ideas expresadas en el idioma maya-chuj, planteamos una reflexión metodológica y analítica con propuestas para romper inercias colonizantes. Reconocemos en los recursos lingüísticos de los pueblos la potencia para reafirmar su existencia cultural y darla a conocer con todo su sentido. Concluimos que la práctica de la traducción dialógica decolonial favorece la comunicación entre culturas rompiendo jerarquías y reivindicando las diferencias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".