MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990756991 · doi:10.3390/app9235108

Artificial Intelligence-Based Controller for DC-DC Flyback Converter

2019· article· en· W2990756991 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Ghulam Abbas, Mohammad Rashid Hussain, Muhammad Usman Asad, Umar Farooq, Jason Gu, Valentina Emilia Bălaş, Muhammad Uzair, Ahmed Bilal Awan, Tanveer Yazdan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMajmaah UniversityKing Khalid University
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemControl theory (sociology)PID controllerComputer scienceMATLABController (irrigation)Control engineeringFlyback converterVoltageFuzzy logicEngineeringArtificial intelligenceFuzzy control systemBoost converterControl (management)Temperature controlElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an intelligent voltage controller designed on the basis of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for a flyback converter (FC) working in continuous conduction mode (CCM). The union of fuzzy logic (FL) and adaptive neural networks (ANN) makes ANFIS more robust against model parameters’ uncertainties and perturbations in input voltage or load current. ANFIS inherits the advantages of structured knowledge representation from FL and learning capability from NN. Comparative analysis showed that the ANFIS controller offers not only the superior transient response characteristics, but also excellent steady-state characteristics compared to those of the FL controller (FLC) and proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers, thus validating its superiority over these traditional controllers. For this purpose, MATLAB/Simulink environment-based simulation results are presented for validation of the proposed converter compensated system under all operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207