MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990768800

Cataclastic production of volcanic ash at Mount Saint Helens

2011· article· en· W2990768800 on OpenAlexaff
Lori A. Kennedy, K. Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueAGUFM · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCataclastic rockGeologyFault gougeShear (geology)CompactionFault (geology)SeismologyComminutionPetrologyVolcanoDaciteGeochemistryGeotechnical engineeringVolcanic rockRhyolite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2004–2008 eruption of Mt. St. Helens (MSH) produced a series of lava domes and spines distinguished by the occurrence of an enveloping carapace of finely comminuted, weakly indurated fault gouge. The fault gouge results from fracture and shear strain, causing comminution of dacite along the conduit walls during ascent. The faulting associated with the formation of gouge is assumed to be the origin of a repetitive microseismicity (i.e., ‘‘drumbeat’’ seismicity) sourced at � 0.5–1 km depth. The early phases of dome extrusion were attended by several small explosive events producing plumes of volcanic ash derived largely from the fault gouge. Here we present experimental results that establish the requisite conditions for this cataclastic production of volcanic ash at MSH. The experiments are low temperature rock deformation experiments performed on MSH dacite under confining pressures consistent with conduit pressures (0.1, 25, 50, 75 MPa). The first set of experiments ended once a through-going shear fracture was formed; these produced a highly localized fault surface and associated fault gouge. A second set of experiments allowed frictional sliding along the fault surface after failure thereby exploring the role of shear strain on grain size reduction of the gouge. Rock strength increases with confining pressure (from 139 to 722 MPa at 0.1 to 75 MPa). Unconfined loading of the MSH dacite produced several longitudinal fractures with little gouge and a small stress drop (� 120 MPa), whereas 75 MPa experiments produced a near-linear shear fracture, with a stress drop of � 300 MPa. The amount of gouge and the grain size distribution of the gouge are only weakly affected by the confining pressure. Continued sliding (i.e., shear strain) causes a substantial increase in the amount of gouge but does not increase the number abundance of the finest (<10 lm) particles. Thus, the finest particles are an expression only of the magnitude of the stress drop event (fracture) and not the shear strain during frictional sliding. The frictional sliding experiments elucidate the coefficient of friction – all confined experiments show stable slip and strain hardening with a slight increase in coefficient of friction from 0.48 to 0.55, with increased confining pressure. The unconfined sample shows a very low apparent coefficient of friction of � 0.17. These results allow us to postulate the following ideas concerning the production of volcanic ash by syn-eruptive cataclasis. The significant stress drop, that produces abundant fine ash-sized particles, demands a material that can store substantial elastic energy prior to failure. Highly crystallized, low porosity magma, such as that found at MSH, and favoured by lower ascent rates, is ideal. More rapid ascent and extrusion of lava domes will result in less crystallized and more porous lava; such materials are much less likely to support the cataclastic production of ash sized gouge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGUFMSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207