MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990775706 · doi:10.1289/isee.2014.o-172

Neighbourhood and Individual-Level Socially-Patterned Risk Factors Interact with Particulate Air Pollution to Modify Birth Weight: a Multilevel Analysis in British Columbia, Canada

2014· article· en· W2990775706 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anders C. Erickson, Laura Arbour

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)Multilevel modelDecileDemographyBirth weightBody mass indexInteractionEnvironmental healthGeographyParticulatesCovariateMedicinePregnancyStatisticsMathematicsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Exposure to particulate air pollution is increasingly being recognized as an important risk factor in adverse perinatal outcomes; however, its potential interaction with socially-patterned risk factors such as maternal smoking, body mass index and neighbourhood deprivation could lead to synergistic effects. The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between particulate matter (PM2.5) and birth weight and its potential interaction with socially-patterned risk factors. Methods: Birth records with several individual-level covariates were obtained from Perinatal Services British Columbia (N=98,563). The modeled PM2.5 (from a national land-use regression model) and deprivation index are validated 3rd party datasets and were linked to the individual births using 6-digit maternal residential postal codes. Linear random-coefficient models were employed to estimate the fixed effects and between-area variability of PM2.5 and neighbourhood deprivation on birth weight with several cross-level interactions being tested. Model residuals were mapped to test for spatial auto-correlation and model misspecification. Results: After controlling for individual-level covariates, deprivation was significantly associated with reduced birth weight (-8.3 grams, 95%CI=-9.4 to -7.2 per decile) and explained 36% of the between-area differences in birth weight. Adding PM2.5 into the model further explained 10% of the between-area variability and reduced birth weight by -27.3 grams (95%CI=-32.7 to -21.9) per unit increase (µg/m3). Significant ameliorative cross-level interaction effects were revealed between PM2.5 and maternal heavy smoking and with obesity, as well as between deprivation and PM2.5. Mapping model residuals showed areas of significant local spatial auto-correlation. Conclusion: We show evidence that heavy smoking and obesity interact with PM2.5 to modify its negative effect on birth weight. Research is ongoing to confirm these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207