Ultrasonographic and Magnetic Resonance Images of Semimembranosus-Tibial Collateral Ligament Bursitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 31-year-old woman presented with pain and swelling in the posteromedial area of her right knee. She had worked as a farmer for 10 months and did not have a history of trauma. On physical examination, deep palpation revealed tenderness along the right posteromedial knee. Ultrasound (US) imaging (12-MHz linear probe, Toshiba, Aplio 500) revealed an anechoic, fluid-filled, distended sac (7.4 × 14.4 × 38.9 mm) that surrounded the superior, medial, and inferior portions of the right semimembranosus (SM) tendon without an increase in vascularity (Figure 1A, B). The sac consisted of deep and superficial pockets. The deep pocket was located between the SM tendon and the posteromedial aspects of the medial meniscus and medial tibial condyle. The superficial pocket was situated between the SM tendon and the tibial collateral ligament (TCL), also known as the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Considering the location and appearance of the fluid sac, it was compatible with a semimembranosus-tibial collateral ligament (SMTCL) bursitis (Supplementary Data) [1]. Confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed fluid over the right SM tendon in a shape similar to an inverted “U,” with the proximal deep and distal superficial pockets forming the two arms of the “U” (Figure 2A–C). These findings indicate SMTCL bursitis [2].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".