MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990857799 · doi:10.2495/dne-v14-n4-249-263

From nature and basic scientific results to modern engineering applications

2019· article· en· W2990857799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringManagement scienceComputer scienceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motto of the paper concerning physics and nature is a quotation by Eugene Wigner: 'The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve'. The first case in this paper is based on an original paper by this author, and it uses Fletcher's scale of speech intelligibility, for analysis of specific noise effect in the presence of background noise. The idea is based on the assumption that the brain uses the same scale for estimating both intelligibility and nuisance by specific noise. This notion was confirmed by experiments. The second case below is the use of the 'simplex theory', which is a mathematical model used in computer sciences, and was published originally by this author as a means for design of environmental sound barriers. The third application involves sophisticated use of specular reflections and scattering in acoustics, with application of acoustic quadratic residues in interiors acoustics, based on the mathematical theory of numbers, where prime numbers are involved. Leading mathematicians in this development are Euclid (325 BC-265 BC) and Gauss (1777-1855), who discovered in the 18th century quadratic residues. In the context of diffraction physics, the main contribution was by Rntgen (1845-1923), von Laue (1879-1960), W.H. Bragg (1862-1942), and W.L. Bragg (1890 This long way towards sophisticated acoustic diffusers that turn specular reflections into a uniform diffusion needed one more leading physicist to make the breakthrough. Manfred Schroeder published a seminal paper in 1975, adding the number theory to room acoustics as a legitimate part. He has proved mathematically that specific panels with a sequence of one-dimensional or two-dimensional grooves result in a diffusive-phase grating of wide band, instead of a specular reflection panel. This result was directly applicable from the theory of x ray diffraction. D'Antonio and Cox continued improving the results, leading to special quadratic residue diffuser (QRD) shapes. Many of the panels resemble shapes that exist in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it