MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990897091 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.113

Stress perceived by pregnant and decision-making factors of maternal caesarean section request

2019· article· en· W2990897091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sébastien Riquet, C. Coste, M Monguillon, Carole Zakarian

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaesarean sectionMedicineQuarter (Canadian coin)IncentivePregnancyPopulationObstetricsGynecologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pregnancy is a time of psychological vulnerability which can generate intense stress. This represents a maternal and child public health problem. Prenatal stress has harmful impacts on the foetus, the newborn and can cause an increased maternal request for caesareans sections, with nonmedical grounds. The perceived level of prenatal stress factors was assessed in women, as well as mothers’ incentives and decision-making factors for a caesarean section on maternal request. Methods A descriptive study on 203 pregnant women, then a comparative study between primiparas (n = 72) and multiparas (n = 131) were carried out with the Antenatal perceived stress inventory. Incentives and decision-making factors for a caesarean on the mother’s demand were studied by in-depth interviews with primiparas mothers (n = 16) who had made this choice. Results The perception of stress level during pregnancy is higher at the first quarter regarding the foetus’ health, medical and obstetric risks and reverses with the perception of projections linked to giving birth at the last quarter. Primiparas are significantly (p < 0.001) more stressed. All the elements of the three assessed factors are very significantly (p < 0.001) correlated for the whole population. Among them, 75% choose a caesarean section on maternal request during the first quarter. This choice is confirmed at the end of the second quarter or during the third one for 50% of them, with a one-month time to think for 58.3% of them. The main incentives are tokophobia (66.7%) and preserving the baby’s health (50%). Conclusions Pregnancy causes important stress, which is pronounced in primiparas. In France, these results speak in favour of screening tokophobia and an earlier start of birth and parenthood preparation classes in order to handle stress from the first quarter of pregnancy, when medical and prenatal exams are initiated. Birth preparation should be taken on at the last quarter. Key messages Investigate stress perceived and identification incentives and decision-making factors of maternal caesarean section request it’s a solution to building bridge for solidarity with tokophobic women. The relation enter stress perceived by pregnant women and decision-making factors of maternal caesarean section request, represents a maternal and child public health problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207