Complete duodenal necrosis associated with non-traumatic duodenal hematoma requiring emergent pancreatico-duodenectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Duodenal necrosis is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis but can occur given the shared blood supply to the head of the pancreas and the duodenum. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 55-year-old male presented with acute-on-chronic pancreatitis and a duodenal hematoma. The hematoma expanded to occlude the biliary tree and, shortly after, the duodenum necrosed and perforated. The patient required an emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy performed in two stages. DISCUSSION: Surgical management is complex and a difficult challenge for a general surgeon. Many advocate for wide drainage to create a controlled fistula using a malecot through the wall defect/separate duodenotomy/a retrograde jejunostomy tube. This case represents an extreme variation on this issue which was best managed by definitive resection given the extent of the necrosis. CONCLUSION: This case report demonstrates that duodenal hematoma and necrosis should be recognized as part of the spectrum of consequences of acute pancreatitis. General surgeons should have a surgical approach to this complication whether that be diversion or definitive resection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".