Experimental investigation on flue gas purification and gas‐liquid multiphase flow in a spraying column with perforated plate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The synergetic removal of sulphur dioxide and particulate matters (PM) in flue gas was investigated in a spraying column equipped with flow pattern controlling (FPC) internals. The performance of the novel column was compared with that of the traditional open column by monitoring the removal efficiency and system pressure drop. To understand the gas‐liquid multiphase flow field and mass transfer process inside the column with different structures, image processing based on the Otsu method and particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology were used. It was found that the FPC column with a section size of 200 mm × 200 mm, hole diameter of 4 mm, and aperture ratio of 0.65 demonstrated the best performance. As clearly observed from the flow filed, bubble flow was formed in FPC column, while the dispersive and falling‐film flow was developed in the open column. The liquid holdup in FPC unit was much more than in the open spraying column, which enhanced the mass transfer process. According to the PIV results, the reverse flow of the liquid, caused by the gas jet ascribed to the perforated plate and the confined space in the FPC unit, was the primary reason for bubble generation and the gas‐liquid flow pattern in the column.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".