MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Application of Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling for Predicting the Intermediation Margin of Islamic Banking Industry

2019· article· en· W2991055279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nurul Kamila, Dwi Suhartanto

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermediationIslamMargin (machine learning)Financial intermediaryNet interest marginMarket liquidityBusinessInflation (cosmology)Islamic bankingFinancial systemMonetary economicsEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)FinanceReturn on assetsComputer scienceProfitability index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to predict the determinants of bank margins (bankspecific as well as macroeconomic condition) in Islamic banks by applying SEM-PLS. Data were collected through financial statements of 11 Islamic banks in Indonesia obtained in each website of bank, covering bank quarter observations for the period of 2013 to the second quarter of 2018. The results of this study indicate the specific factors of banks that have the greatest influence on NIM are liquidity variables. In contrast, macroeconomic factors (GDP and inflation) do not have a significant effect on Islamic bank NIMs, but specific bank and macroeconomic factors together affect Islamic bank NIMs. while the macroeconomic condition is not significant. In this study using the method of investigating the determinants of the margin of financial intermediation for Islamic banks operating in Indonesia by applying SEM-PLS. This finding improves our understanding on the usage of SEM-PLS to predict the margin intermediation of Islamic banks. This study provides a guidance and strategy for Islamic bank managers to manage their intermediation margin which can affect their customers interest to use Islamic banking services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207