MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991103212 · doi:10.1002/cbic.201900635

Validation of <scp>l</scp>‐Tellurienylalanine as a Phenylalanine Isostere

2019· article· en· W2991103212 on OpenAlexafffund
Nesrin Vurgun, Mark Nitz

Bibliographic record

VenueChemBioChem · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicOrganoselenium and organotellurium chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIsosterePhenylalanineChemistryStereochemistryBiochemistryComputational biologyAmino acidBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mass cytometry (MC) and imaging mass cytometry (IMCTM) have emerged as important tools for the study of biological heterogeneity. We recently demonstrated the use of l‐2‐tellurienylalanine (TePhe), a mimic of phenylalanine (Phe), as an MC‐ and IMC‐compatible protein synthesis reporter. In this work, the biochemical similarity of TePhe and its cognate analogue, Phe, are examined in the context of the RNase S complex. Isothermal titration calorimetry studies show that incorporation of TePhe preserves the interaction of S‐peptide with S‐protein, and the dissociation constants for the interaction of the Phe and TePhe peptides are within a factor of two. The resulting RNase S complex is catalytically active without significant alterations in the enzyme's kinetic parameters. Furthermore, circular dichroism spectroscopy does not reveal any changes to the secondary structure of TePhe‐substituted RNase S. These findings provide strong evidence that TePhe functions as a Phe isostere in the context of a folded protein. It is anticipated that incorporation of TePhe into peptides or peptidomimetic scaffolds will enable facile generation of MC and IMCTM probes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemBioChemSame topicOrganoselenium and organotellurium chemistryFrench-language works237,207