CSAP and TFSG – Circuit Symbolic Analysis Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the symbolic, partial - symbolic and numeric generation of the transfer functions for both single-in-single-out (SISO), respectively multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) circuits, the initial version of the Circuit Symbolic Analysis Program (CSAP) program evolved into so-called Transfer Function Symbolic Generation (TFSG) program. Circuits analyzed via CSAP and TFSG may contain linear and nonlinear resistors, inductors, and capacitors, independent voltage, and current sources, all four types of linear controlled sources: voltage-controlled voltage source (VCVS), voltage-controlled current source (VCCS), current-controlled voltage source (CCVS), current-controlled current source (CCCS). It can also contain any multi-pol and multi-port, having an equivalent circuit made up of only two-terminal electrical elements alongside the controlled sources. Furthermore, we proved that both CSAP and TFSG are handy tools for analysis and design of the nonlinear time-invariant analog circuits because we can keep as the symbols only parameters associated with these circuit elements. The work concludes with some illustrative examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".