A CRISE DO CAPITALISMO DEMOCRÁTICO: NEOLIBERALISMO, ESTADO E IDENTIDADE NO SÉCULO XXI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the nature of the systemic crisis of capitalism and its reverberations in the democratic rule of law. In order to do so, it will first be demonstrated that the origins of the so-called 2000s crisis is a manifestation of a broader one, whose origins date back to the ruin of the pattern of post-war capital accumulation. Having clarified the factors that characterize the historical period begun in the 1970s and the bases of the neoliberal doctrine, we turn to the analysis of the impacts of private rationality on the State and on democracy itself. From the contributions of Laval and Dardot (2016), and by using the method of literature review, it will be argued that, more than an economic policy, neoliberalism presents itself as a new rationality, capable of structuring behaviors and subjectivities. In this sense, this study will seek to clarify the extent to which this neoliberal paradigm affects the rationality of the state as it implies an inflection in the construction of its own identity. To this end, an overlap will be made between Alexander Wendt's (1992) and Nicholas Onuf's (1998) Constructivism, which will support the US case study of the 1970s and the Trump years. At the end of these efforts, we hope to demonstrate, and illustrate, how neoliberalism informs a new state identity that is no longer informed by classical democratic values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".