Heterogeneous method of chitosan film preparation: Effect of multifunctional acid on film properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The heterogeneous crosslinking method was applied to chitosan films with citric acid to observe and understand the effect of a multifunctional acid at a low concentration on film properties. Neat and neutralized chitosan films and films containing 15% (w/w) citric acid (denoted as CA films) were characterized by mechanical, water vapor permeability (WVP), and thermogravimetric analysis tests. The CA films displayed a higher tensile strength by 10%, lower WVP by 30%, and higher thermal stability, compared to neutralized films. The crystalline structure converted back from tendon to Type II after the addition of citric acid, as determined by X‐ray diffraction. Neat films displayed a lower water contact angle (72°) compared to neutralized and CA films (78°–79°). The heterogeneous method was also applied to incorporate a plasticizer into a neutralized film to potentially observe the glass transition using dynamic mechanical analysis. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020 , 137 , 48648.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".