Knowledge and sexual behaviors of transgender individuals faced with the risk of STI/HIV in Benin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The issue of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) cannot be solved without considering the transgender population. This research aims to describe the knowledge, attitudes and sexual behaviors of transgender individuals faced with the risk of STIs and HIV/AIDS in Benin. Methods Transgender individuals were selected by respondent-driven sampling throughout the country in 2017. Included in this analysis were individuals who identified as transgender and adopted its mode of expression, aged 15 years and greater, and who gave their consent to participate. Results A total of 308 transgender individuals were surveyed, of which 89.6% were of male gender at birth. The participants had a good level of knowledge in the matter of STI and HIV/AIDS. In fact, 99.9% among them cited at least one symptom of STIs; 95.1% cited the three main methods of transmission of HIV and 54% are aware the risk of sexual transmission of HIV is higher between men. Participants were more than 90% likely to declare a positive attitude to care for persons living with HIV (PLWHIV) or to share the same room with them (93.2%). Concerning sexual behaviors, the average age at the first sexual encounter as a transgender individual was 14 years old. During the last three months, transgender individuals declared three regular male partners on average. The usage of condoms during the last sexual intercourse was reported in 86.6% of cases. Knowledge of the serological status of the sexual partner (31.7%) and the loss of sensation induced by the condom (26.8%) constituted the main reasons of non-usage of condoms. Conclusions Although adopting some risky sexual behavior, transgender individuals are a population that is relatively well informed and with favorable attitudes regarding STIs and HIV/AIDS. These factors are significant assets to be considered in the development of programs for STIs and HIV/AIDS control. Key messages Transgender individuals good level of knowledge is an asset for STIs/HIV control. Sexual multi-partnership seems to be common despite a good level of knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".