Hardware-in-the-loop Simulations of Inverter Faults in an Electric Drive System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Power Hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) and Controller-HIL (CHIL) simulations have several benefits with respect to electric drive system testing. Since there is a reduced chance of equipment damage with CHIL and PHIL simulations, they are particularly suited to study the impact of inverter faults. This paper presents PHIL simulations to emulate machine behavior in the event of such inverter faults. The faults considered here are the gate unit failure (or the device open circuit fault) of one or more switches in the driving inverter. The process of voltage sensing, especially during faults, is first explained in this paper. It is shown that the driving inverter terminal voltage is defined, even during faults, thus allowing the possibility to control the PHIL system during these conditions. Experimental results are presented for the same fault conditions from the PHIL system and a prototype permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) coupled to a dc dynamometer. A close match between the two results is shown, proving the ability to operate the PHIL system in current control mode even during such faults. A close match between the two results also proves the sufficiency and utility of PHIL simulations to study driving inverter faults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".