MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk Factors for Developing Anxiety in Inuit Adolescents from Nunavik

2018· article· en· W2991325533 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vickie Lamoureux, Gina Muckle, Françoise S. Maheu, Joseph L. Jacobson, Sandra W. Jacobson, Pierre Ayotte, Richard E. Bélanger, Dave Saint‐Amour

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyMedicinePsychiatryDemographyPsychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Anxiety among Inuit adolescents in the Arctic has not previously been studied empirically, although the evidence of major anxiety-related problems in this community. In addition to describe anxiety markers, we examined their relationships with diverse developmental risk factors including exposure to environmental chemicals, a specific subject of concerns in Nunavik.Methods: Anxiety was assessed in 89 Inuit participants (Mean age=18.4y; Range=16.2 to 21.9y) enrolled in the longitudinal Nunavik Child Development Study. They completed the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) assessing situational (State) and general (Trait) anxiety levels. Potential risk factors of anxiety documented through follow-ups were examined at birth, at 11 years of age and at the time of assessment, including blood levels of chemicals (Hg, lead, PCBs), nutrients and vitamins, as well as age, sex, IQ, drug/alcohol, bullying, family violence, food insecurity, crowding and SES.Results: Anxiety scores on both questionnaires were high, particularly for the SCARED, which mean score was above the clinical threshold. Multiple regression results show that significant risk predictors of the SCARED scores were exposure to Hg during childhood (β=.25, p=.02) and adolescence (β=.27, p=.004), food insecurity (β=.27, p=.004), bullying history (β=.21, p=.03) and female status (β=.26, p=.01). For the STAI, the only significant predictor was IQ (β= -.27, p=.02) on Trait, whereas concentration of cord blood Hg (β=.25, p=.03), home crowding during childhood (β=.34, p=.002), adolescence (β=.23, p=.02), food insecurity (β=.22, p=.03), vitamin E (β=-.25, p=.02) and selenium (β=.21, p=.04) were found to be the significant predictors of anxiety on State.Conclusions: Our findings show that Inuit adolescents are at risk for anxiety via multiple contributing factors, particularly chronic exposure to Hg, food insecurity and female status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207