MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2991370578 · doi:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.28

Abstract 28: Feasibility and Safety of Pre-Hospital Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in Non-Traumatic Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

2019· article· en· W2991370578 on OpenAlexaff
Jostein Rødseth Brede, Thomas Lafrenz, Pål Klepstad, Eivinn Årdal Skjærseth, Trond Nordseth, Edmund Sövik, Andreas Krüger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsKruger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReturn of spontaneous circulationCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitationBalloon catheterAortaAnesthesiaPulseless electrical activityCatheterSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low and any measure that may improve circulation to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is beneficial. The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) will redistribute cardiac output to the organs proximal to the occlusion. Animal studies supports that aortic occlusion during CPR might benefit patients suffering from OHCA, but human data are scarce. Methods: We performed an observational study at the helicopter emergency medical service in Trondheim (Norway) to assess the feasibility and safety of establishing REBOA in OHCA patients. The femoral artery was identified by ultrasound and a REBOA catheter was placed in the thoracic aorta. All patients received advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) during the procedure. REBOA eligibility, procedural success and time intervals were registered. A safety monitoring program was conducted to ensure that the procedure did not interfere with the quality of ACLS. Results: REBOA was initiated in ten of 98 OHCA patients. The mean age was 63 years (55-71) and 7 were male. The REBOA procedure was successful in all cases (100%), with 80% success rate on first cannulation attempt. Mean REBOA procedural time was 11,7 minutes (8-16, SD 3,2). End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) increased by a mean of 1.9 kPa at 60 seconds after inflation compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Six of 10 patients (60%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation, 3 (30%) was admitted to hospital. 30-day survival was 10%. The mean width of the femoral artery and vein during CPR was 5,9 mm (3,6 - 7,4, SD 1,2) and 9,4 mm (5,0 - 12,9, SD 2,9), respectively. The safety monitoring group identified no negative influence on the ACLS quality. Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the pre-hospital use of REBOA in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest. The REBOA procedure does not interfere with the quality of the ACLS. REBOA is a feasible adjunct treatment in OHCA. The significant increase in EtCO2 after occlusion suggests improved organ circulation during CPR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→