MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991377056

Inequalities in Access to Higher Education: Methodological and Theoretical Issues - Social Inclusion - Thematic volume 7/1, open access

2019· article· en· W2991377056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gaële Goastellec, Jussi Välimaa

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Capital and Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyInclusion (mineral)Access to Higher EducationHigher educationSocial inequalityGermanInequalityGender studiesLibrary scienceMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/issue/view/101 Table of Contents: Access to Higher Education: An Instrument for Fair Societies? www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1841 By Gaële Goastellec and Jussi Välimaa Expanding Access to Higher Education and Its (Limited) Consequences for Social Inclusion: The Brazilian Experience www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1672 By Elizabeth Balbachevsky, Helena Sampaio and Cibele Yahn de Andrade School Market in Quebec and the Reproduction of Social Inequalities in Higher Education www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1613 By Pierre Canisius Kamanzi Second-Chance Alternatives and Maintained Inequality in Access to Higher Education in Israel www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1612 By Eyal Bar-Haim and Carmel Blank Who Goes to College via Access Routes? A Comparative Study of Widening Participation Admission in Selective Universities in Ireland and England www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1647 By Katriona O’Sullivan, Delma Byrne, James Robson and Niall Winters The Achievement of University Access: Conversion Factors, Capabilities and Choices www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1615 By Melanie Walker The Widening Participation Agenda in German Higher Education: Discourses and Legitimizing Strategies www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1605 By Julia Mergner, Liudvika Leišytė and Elke Bosse Refugee Students’ Access to Three European Universities: An Ethnographic Study www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1622 By Katrin Sontag Reliability of Longitudinal Social Surveys of Access to Higher Education: The Case of Next Steps in England www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1631 By Nadia Siddiqui, Vikki Boliver and Stephen Gorard Equal Access to the Top? Measuring Selection into Finnish Academia www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1620 By Jouni Helin, Kristian Koerselman, Terhi Nokkala, Timo Tohmo and Jutta Viinikainen Open House? Class-Specific Career Opportunities within German Universities www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1621 By Frerk Blome, Christina Möller and Anja Böning

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.531
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRISSame topicSocial Capital and NetworksFrench-language works237,207