MAPPING OF QUALITY INDEX AND POLLUTION RISK ALONG ROSETTA BRANCH USING GIS TECHNIQUES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water quality of Rosetta Branch may be changed by several factors in the last decades as a result of anthropogenic activities. So, it’s important to study water class along Rosetta Branch. This research focused on assessment surface water quality along Rosetta Branch using Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME-WQI) supported by Egyptian guidelines of law 48/1982 decision 92/2013. Rosetta Branch received most pollutants from two hot spots namely: El-Rahawy drain and industrial activities in Kafr El-Zayat city. The water quality of eight sites-the main surface water resource for Delta Barrage, Edfina Barrage, Rahway, Sable, Tharir, Zawieyt El-bahr, Tala drains outfall and outlet of Rosetta Branch on Mediterranean Sea were investigated. The Geographic Information System (GIS) was used for mapping the WQI variations in different sites. The results of the index average for different sites location at each site showed that the water quality in the studied sites ranked as marginal or fair. This is attributed to the fact of the concentrations of heavy metals, ammonia and organic matter increase in sites that are more affected by drainage water from different drains in the study area. Great efforts are needed and wastewater must be treated before draining it into the River Nile water
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".