MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991473116 · doi:10.3354/meps13189

Ontogenetic shifts and interspecies variation in tolerance to desiccation and heat at the early benthic phase of six intertidal invertebrates

2019· article· en· W2991473116 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
HJ Hamilton, LA Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntertidal zoneBiologyBenthic zoneDesiccationEcologyOntogenyDesiccation toleranceInvertebrateZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 634:15-28 (2020) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13189 Ontogenetic shifts and interspecies variation in tolerance to desiccation and heat at the early benthic phase of six intertidal invertebrates Hilary J. Hamilton, Louis A. Gosselin* Department of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way, Kamloops, BC, V2C 0C8, Canada *Corresponding author: lgosselin@tru.ca ABSTRACT: During the early benthic phase of intertidal invertebrates, desiccation and elevated temperature are increasingly recognized as the most significant stressors, but it is not known whether all species are equally sensitive during this phase. In this study, involving 6 co-occurring rocky intertidal species (Nucella ostrina, Littorina scutulata, Mytilus trossulus, Chthamalus dalli, Balanus glandula, Petrolisthes cinctipes), we examined interspecific variation in (1) tolerance to desiccation and temperature at the early benthic phase and (2) the magnitude of ontogenetic shifts in tolerance. Ontogenetic shifts in temperature tolerance were significant but modest, whereas desiccation tolerance thresholds changed considerably throughout ontogeny in all species, and shifts were greatest in species that changed microhabitats during ontogeny. Tolerance at the early benthic phase also varied markedly among species; temperature tolerance thresholds ranged from 32.3 to 45.8°C, and juveniles were able to survive exposure to desiccation for durations ranging from 10 min to 29 h. Ontogenetic shifts in desiccation tolerance were largely explained by differences in body mass; thus individuals achieve increased tolerance through growth. However, variation among species was unrelated to body mass; rather, interspecific variation in tolerance thresholds of the early benthic phase was related to the upper limit of intertidal distribution of the species and to microhabitat use during this phase. The study revealed desiccation to be a greater threat to early benthic phase individuals than temperature in all species, but also discovered considerable interspecific differences in tolerance thresholds, such that species are likely to respond differently to present and future extremes in desiccation and temperature. KEY WORDS: Ontogenetic shifts · Tolerance threshold · Early benthic phase · Juveniles · Environmental stress · Mortality factors · Microhabitat use · Interspecific variation Full text in pdf format Supplementary material PreviousNextCite this article as: Hamilton HJ, Gosselin LA (2020) Ontogenetic shifts and interspecies variation in tolerance to desiccation and heat at the early benthic phase of six intertidal invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 634:15-28. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13189 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 634. Online publication date: January 23, 2020 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2020 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207